Hugo

Continuity mistake: When the monkey-wrench falls, it lays on the middle of two tiles. When the angle changes, it lays on the center of a tile.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When the automaton signs the drawing, it makes a dot inches away to the right of the "L". When Hugo hands the drawing to the lady, the dot is a thick mark right over the "L".

Sacha

Continuity mistake: After the inspector saves Hugo, he yells at him "What were you thinking of?" Hugo's hair is moving wildly in one angle, still in the next angle, then wild, and finally back to still.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: While the inspector flirts with Lissette, she is standing sideways or straight, depending on the angle.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When the drawings fly all over the room, the ones on the box's lid appear / disappear randomly between shots.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When the automaton signs the drawing, the tip of the "G" is under a line circling the moon's face. When the angle changes, the "G" is covering part of the moon's face.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: After the automaton stops writing for the first time, Hugo steps backwards and faces it with his head positioned straight. A frame later it's tilted to the left.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: Lighting on the automaton changes between shots when Hugo uncovers it for the first time, notice the structure underneath: from hidden to visible.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When Frick greets the lady for the first time, a waiter suddenly appears next to her in the second angle.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When Hugo leaves the notebook on the counter, it swaps from laying straight to skewed between shots.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: At the toy-shop, Hugo empties his pocket and Méliès places his hand over the cloth and then takes it back. From the opposite angle, the hand is still over the cloth.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When Hugo is walking with his uncle, carrying the automaton, the way he holds it differs between the first and second shot.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: The position of the automaton's arm when writing for the first time is inconsistent between shots.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: When Hugo is outside Isabelle's place for the first time, he is standing by the middle of a brick column. When the angle changes he is by its side.

Sacha

Continuity mistake: The automaton stops making the drawing, right before signing it, and the hand lays by the bottom of a white part of the paper. In the next shot it has magically moved several centimeters above, right on top of the drawing.

Sacha

More mistakes in Hugo

Hugo Cabret: I'd imagine the whole world was one big machine. Machines never come with any extra parts, you know. They always come with the exact amount they need. So I figured, if the entire world was one big machine, I couldn't be an extra part. I had to be here for some reason.

More quotes from Hugo

Trivia: Shortly after Hugo drops a piece of metal from the suspending clock to the ground of the train station, the Station Inspector, assuming that Claude dropped it, loudly asks him if he is 'drunk, inebriated, shikker, etc.' The work shikker is from the Hebrew word shikkor for 'drunk'. Shikker actually means drunkard.

Allister Cooper, 2011

More trivia for Hugo

Question: Why does the Station Inspector chase children who are on their own and threaten to send them to an Orphanage? Is that what it was like in the 1930s?

Luka Keats

Answer: He's not making it a point to chase down random children - he's like a security officer at an airport. It's his job to apprehend thieves and troublemakers and keep the station safe, and he only threatens to send children to the orphanage if they don't have parents for him to return them to. Also, it's implied once he finally apprehends Hugo that his particular harshness toward orphans (and most of his character flaws in general) is due to apparently having been one himself. He spells out the kinds of lessons he was forced to learn by growing up without a family, explaining how he became so cold, bitter, and antisocial.

Chosen answer: It is more than likely an early form of our modern day child protection. Just as today if children are found to be at risk, they can be and are taken away by social services and put into foster care. In the film, orphans may have been seen as a plague in an area that attracts posh looking people in stark contrast to urchins in rags eating out of bins. Most European orphanages/care homes/hospices/whatever you want to call them at that time were no better than anything depicted in Charles Dickens 50 years previously.

Neil Jones

More questions & answers from Hugo

Join the mailing list

Separate from membership, this is to get updates about mistakes in recent releases. Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Check out the mistake & trivia books, on Kindle and in paperback.