Corrected entry: Supposedly the thing landed/crashed and crawled out afterwards into the freezing arctic, where it froze solid. Well and good. Why did it leave the ship into the freezing environment it could not tolerate? As soon as it enters the ship it fires it up and starts to take off. So there was apparently nothing wrong with the ship requiring it to go outside in the first place.
Corrected entry: In a deleted scene, when they burn Karl, it is obvious that the stuntman is wearing a fake "Karl" mask.
Correction: Which is one of the reasons they deleted the scene. It's like saying one of the actors flubbed their lines in an unused take.
Corrected entry: If the creature can't imitate inanimate material, how does it replicate the person's clothing perfectly?
Correction: It doesn't. In every case, it rips through the person's clothes, leaving them covered in blood. It tries to hide the clothing in various ways, but several times we see the blood-soaked clothes. It simply puts on new clothes.
Corrected entry: I can just barely understand the logic behind an Antarctic research station having a small number of handguns and at least one assault rifle. But flamethrowers and grenades? No reason, other than to drive the plot.
Correction: Should there be a loss of power, flamethrowers and thermite grenades would be useful for melting ice and starting fires for warmth. And it actually makes a lot of sense to have weapons in 1982, it was still the Cold War and the Soviets had a large presence there.
Correction: The idea is the alien got flung out of the ship when it crashed, ending up in the ice and freezing solid before it could escape back inside.
lionhead