Rings

Your rating

Average rating

(2 votes)

Add your review

In order to be credited for your review and save all your ratings, please create a free account and log in. Premium membership is also available for just $12 a year, which removes all adverts, prioritises your submissions, and more.

While it benefits from some slick direction courtesy the usually reliable F. Javier Gutierrez, "Rings" ultimately falls flat thanks to uneven performances, an oddly confusing narrative and bizarre editing choices. It's a frustrating film, because there's potential... but it's all squandered and lost thanks to obvious studio-enforced re-shoots and re-edits, which leave the film feeling disjointed and without focus.

TedStixon

Upvote valid corrections to help move entries into the corrections section.

Suggested correction: There is nothing that indicates the airplane is a 747.

More mistakes in Rings

Burke: There's a mark on your hand. It says "rebirth."

More quotes from Rings

Trivia: While the film was mildly financially successful (bringing in over $80 million worldwide on a relatively small $25 million budget), it was seen as a disappointment for the studio, bringing in only about half the gross of its immediate predecessor ("The Ring Two"), and only about 1/3 the total gross of the first film. ("The Ring") Due to the film under-performing, the studio Paramount put an indefinite hold on another planned franchise revival - "Friday the 13th", fearing it would similarly perform below expectations.

More trivia for Rings

Join the mailing list

Separate from membership, this is to get updates about mistakes in recent releases. Addresses are not passed on to any third party, and are used solely for direct communication from this site. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Check out the mistake & trivia books, on Kindle and in paperback.