Question: To establish quicker communication with NASA, Whatley savages a previously sent probe that was on Mars. He initially finds it by stepping on its parachute and finds the probe in remarkably good condition. Later in the film, NASA directs him to remove the nose cap of the capsule he will be leaving Mars in and cover the opening with canvas. This is described as being viable as the atmosphere on Mars is so thin it's not a problem. Wouldn't the previous probe have crashed on Mars and thus be damaged?
Quantom X
15th Oct 2025
The Martian (2015)
30th Aug 2018
The Martian (2015)
Question: Mark finds pathfinder, and takes it back to the hab, and recharges it. Wouldn't he have to repair it first? The rover is very old, and hasn't been used in decades.
Answer: Maybe some slight repairs sure, but it wouldn't have been nearly as damaged as you would think. Unlike on Earth, the Martian atmosphere lacks enough oxygen to cause corrosion or rust. And since the Pathfinder has been buried, it wouldn't have really taken much damage from weathering or light past that point. In other words, the conditions of Mars would have actually preserved it pretty well.
I am not asking whether or not he would have to repair the rover due to the effects of corrosion, or rust. I am asking whether or not he would to repair the rover due to the effects of aging.
What I said still stands for that. A lot of the issues with equipment aging is due to being exposed to the elements. Oxygen in the air oxidizing metals, sun light cracking plastics and rubber, the presence of bacteria and other microscopic life forms causing bio degradation, etc. Those are the main reasons why machinery and equipment here on Earth are subject to deteriorating with time and age. The environment the Pathfinder was in is a stark contrast and it was basically kept preserved like in a museum... so to speak. Yes, it's been up there for 2-3 decades. But the amount of aging it would have taken from that might only be equivalent to a couple years or so if it were here on Earth. The environment, and especially the air and exposure to sunlight, are the main contributors to the aging process of non living items. Being buried under the Martian soil for 30 years most protected it from any exposure to the elements that would cause aging.
But being buried in sand could damage it too though right, Given that it could allow sand to get inside the rover, and damage the electronics?
No. Dust storms are a part of life on Mars - any rover would be designed to withstand sand intrusion, or not be affected by it to any serious extent, otherwise they'd stop working. Spirit and Opportunity massively outlasted their original mission parameters despite frequent dust storms which would apply much more pressure than being buried.
Wouldn't it have crash-landed on Mars and be significantly damaged if the atmosphere on Mars is so thin that it could blast off with only a canvas nose cap? What are the parachutes catching to slow the descent?
Answer: You also have to consider that Mars has about 1/3 of the gravity of Earth, so when things are falling, it takes much less air to slow it down, and the impact would also not be near as hard.
Quantom X ★